GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GLGA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 July 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1215 MHz757 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1125 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.00
Floating-point processing powerno data4.608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 July 2017 6 July 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 Max-Q and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 22 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.