ATI Radeon 7000 vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4291547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.57no data
Power efficiency19.94no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGP107RV100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1493 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate48.610.55
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs323

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4481
+223950%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44no data
4K11no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52no data
4K34.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 32 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 29 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 23 Watt

Quadro P1000 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 73.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P1000 and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 596 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 196 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.