NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs AMD FirePro W4100
Comparison of Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
59.2 GTexel / s
20.16 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Low Profile / Half Length
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
80.19 GB / s
72 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100.
Dual-link DVI support
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
APIs supported by Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 12 (FL 12_1), Shader 5.0
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro P1000 11.11 +409.6%
FirePro W4100 2.18
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Quadro P1000 30721 +142.7%
FirePro W4100 12657
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Quadro P1000 4508 +182.8%
FirePro W4100 1594
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Quadro P1000 4787 +187.5%
FirePro W4100 1665
Quadro P1000 4412 +175.8%
FirePro W4100 1600
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P1000
409.6% faster (about 5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 February 2017 vs 2 October 2015)
Higher memory bandwidth (80.19 vs 72 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (47 vs 50 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Advantages of AMD FirePro W4100
AMD PowerTune technology
AMD ZeroCore Power technology
PCI Express 3.0 x16
max. 4 Displays
AMD App Acceleration
So, Quadro P1000 or FirePro W4100?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro P1000.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro P1000 and FirePro W4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.