Radeon PRO W7800 vs Quadro NVS 55 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.91
Power efficiencyno data19.45
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV34 B1Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 May 2005 (19 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4480
Core clock speed250 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2499 MHz
Number of transistors45 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000699.7
Floating-point processing powerno data44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-Video3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 260 Watt

NVS 55 PCI has 2500% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 55 PCI and Radeon PRO W7800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 55 PCI
Quadro NVS 55 PCI
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 55 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.