Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs Quadro NVS 510M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1197not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG71NV43
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 August 2006 (18 years ago)14 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed450 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors278 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate10.802.000
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data187 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 August 2006 14 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

NVS 510M has an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 440 PCIe x16, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 510M and Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 510M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
Quadro NVS 510M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.