Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs Quadro NVS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1478not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG98Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$163.14 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2512
Core clock speed480 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.920 ×235.20
Floating-point processing power0.0192 TFLOPS ×21.126 TFLOPS
ROPs4 ×28
TMUs4 ×232
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

Vega 8 Efficient has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 450 and Radeon Vega 8 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 450 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 8 Efficient is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Quadro NVS 450
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 86 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 450 or Radeon Vega 8 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.