ATI FirePro V9800 vs Quadro NVS 450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1409not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.33no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG98Cypress
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)9 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$163.14 $3,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81600
Core clock speed480 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.84068.00
Floating-point processing power0.0192 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 450 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 450 and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Quadro NVS 450
ATI FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.