Radeon R9 290X2 vs Quadro NVS 440

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.23no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV43 A4Hawaii
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 February 2006 (18 years ago)24 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$96.99 $1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2816
Core clock speed250 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors146 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000176.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.632 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8176

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length187 mmno data
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s345.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DMS-592x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2006 24 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 580 Watt

NVS 440 has 1771% lower power consumption.

R9 290X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 440 and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 440 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440
Quadro NVS 440
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.