ATI Rage Mobility-M vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1381not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG98Rage Mobility
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 February 1999 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2no data
Core clock speed550 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.400 ×20.08
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs4 ×21
TMUs8 ×21
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×24 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz70 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2560.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2009 1 February 1999
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm

NVS 420 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 438% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 420 and Rage Mobility-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 420 is a workstation graphics card while Rage Mobility-M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or Rage Mobility-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.