Quadro FX 550M vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1363not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.63no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG98G73
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date20 January 2009 (16 years ago)13 March 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2no data
Core clock speed550 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors210 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400 ×25.760
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs4 ×28
TMUs8 ×212
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2009 13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

NVS 420 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX 550M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 420 and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 420 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Quadro NVS 420
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or Quadro FX 550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.