GeForce GTX 480 512 vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1362not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.63no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98GF100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 January 2009 (16 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2512
Core clock speed550 MHz527 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400 ×233.73
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs4 ×248
TMUs8 ×264
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×21536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2134.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 375 Watt

NVS 420 has 837.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 480 512, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce GTX 480 Core 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 420 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Quadro NVS 420
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.