ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs Quadro NVS 320M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG84M82
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 June 2007 (17 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3240
Core clock speed575 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors289 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate9.2001.800
Floating-point processing power0.0736 TFLOPS0.036 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2007 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 12 Watt

NVS 320M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility HD 3430, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 320M and Mobility Radeon HD 3430. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Mobility Radeon HD 3430

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.