GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 vs Quadro NVS 300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG73GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2006 (19 years ago)27 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13216
Core clock speed500 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors177 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00041.47
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs228
TMUs472
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s111.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2006 27 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 171 Watt

NVS 300M has 968.8% lower power consumption.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 300M and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 300M or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.