ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1363not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.72no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG98R360
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 May 2009 (15 years ago)4 March 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz378 MHz
Number of transistors210 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3203.024
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s21.63 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 4 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 60 Watt

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 130.8% more advanced lithography process, and 160.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 295 and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 17 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.