Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1409not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG98GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)11 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 $1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8192
Core clock speed540 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32038.53
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs864
L2 Cache16 KB192 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 552.2% lower power consumption.

FX 4800 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 295 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.