GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG98G80
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)12 February 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 $269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896
Core clock speed540 MHz513 MHz
Number of transistors210 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt143 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32024.62
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs824
L2 Cache16 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB320 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s63.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 12 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 320 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 143 Watt

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 521.7% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 320, on the other hand, has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 295 and GeForce 8800 GTS 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or GeForce 8800 GTS 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.