ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs Quadro NVS 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1282not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency2.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG86RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 October 2007 (18 years ago)25 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed459 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors210 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6721.300
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2007 25 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 30 Watt

NVS 290 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 290 and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 290 or Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.