Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Quadro NVS 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency2.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameG86Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 October 2007 (18 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1614080
Core clock speed459 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors210 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6721,496
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8880
Tensor Coresno data880
L1 Cacheno data3.4 MB
L2 Cache16 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2007 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 600 Watt

NVS 290 has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 290 and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 290 or Radeon Instinct MI300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.