Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1516not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.47no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed275 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors75 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.100291.4
Floating-point processing powerno data9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 120 Watt

NVS 285 has 567% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.