Radeon HD 7950M vs Quadro NVS 285

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1516not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.47no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Wimbledon
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed275 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors75 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10056.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 285 has 317% lower power consumption.

HD 7950M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Radeon HD 7950M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7950M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Radeon HD 7950M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.