Quadro NVS 280 SD vs Quadro NVS 285
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1455 | 1548 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.44 | no data |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | NV44 A2 | NV18 C1 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 June 2006 (18 years ago) | 31 May 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $27.99 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 275 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 75 million | 29 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.100 | 1.000 |
| ROPs | 2 | 2 |
| TMUs | 4 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 250 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DMS-59 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 8.0 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 June 2006 | 31 May 2005 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
NVS 285 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.
NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
