ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1601not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV18 C1RV730
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2005 (20 years ago)11 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed250 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors29 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00019.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm193 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 11 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 280 SD has 400% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 SD and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD
ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 280 SD or Radeon HD 4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.