ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16091490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.23
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV18 C1R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2005 (20 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors29 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0003.040
ROPs28
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0 (9_0)
OpenGL1.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2
ATI 9800 PRO 59
+2850%
Samples: 32

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 47 Watt

NVS 280 SD has an age advantage of 2 years, and 370% lower power consumption.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 SD and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 280 SD or Radeon 9800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.