FirePro S9170 vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1576not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV18 C1Hawaii
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 May 2005 (20 years ago)8 July 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2816
Core clock speed250 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors29 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000163.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.238 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4176

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 8 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 275 Watt

NVS 280 SD has 2650% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 SD and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD
AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 280 SD or FirePro S9170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.