RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.07
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV37AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 May 2004 (20 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data12800
Core clock speed275 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors45 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1001,020
Floating-point processing powerno data65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs4400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-594x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 May 2004 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 280 PCIe has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 PCIe and RTX 5000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 74 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.