GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 vs Quadro NVS 280 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1553not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.12no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV34 B1G96B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 October 2003 (22 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed275 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors45 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1009.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm175 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2003 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 280 PCI has 284.6% lower power consumption.

9500 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 PCI and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 11 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 280 PCI or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.