ATI Radeon X300 SE vs Quadro NVS 210S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1544not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameC51RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 December 2003 (22 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed425 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors75 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate0.851.300
ROPs14
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 1 September 2004
Chip lithography 90 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 30 Watt

NVS 210S has a 22.2% more advanced lithography process, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

ATI X300 SE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 210S and Radeon X300 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 210S is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Quadro NVS 210S
ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 210S or Radeon X300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.