Radeon E9175 PCIe vs Quadro NVS 210S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1537not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameC51Lexa
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 December 2003 (21 years ago)3 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed425 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors75 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8539.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs232
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs5x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2003 3 October 2017
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 210S has 354.5% lower power consumption.

E9175 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 210S and Radeon E9175 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 210S is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E9175 PCIe is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Quadro NVS 210S
AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe
Radeon E9175 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon E9175 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 210S or Radeon E9175 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.