ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 vs Quadro NVS 160M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.00no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG98M52
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)19 January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86
Core clock speed580 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors210 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.6401.400
Floating-point processing power0.0232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 19 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

NVS 160M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 160M and Mobility Radeon X1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 160M is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon X1300 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Quadro NVS 160M
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
Mobility Radeon X1300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.