H100 SXM5 vs Quadro NVS 160M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.00no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG98GH100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88448
Core clock speed580 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1780 MHz
Number of transistors210 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate4.640939.8
Floating-point processing power0.0232 TFLOPS30.07 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs8528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s1,920 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.19.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 700 Watt

NVS 160M has 5733.3% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 160M and H100 SXM5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 160M is a mobile workstation card while H100 SXM5 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Quadro NVS 160M
NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.