ATI Radeon X1300 vs Quadro NVS 140M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 140M with Radeon X1300, including specs and performance data.
NVS 140M outperforms ATI X1300 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1445 | 1472 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.45 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | G86 | RV515 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 1 December 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 3.200 | 1.800 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0256 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 6
+50%
| 4−5
−50%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| God of War | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| God of War | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| God of War | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Valorant | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
This is how NVS 140M and ATI X1300 compete in popular games:
- NVS 140M is 50% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 0.14 |
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 1 December 2005 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 90 nm |
NVS 140M has a 35.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro NVS 140M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 140M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon X1300 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
