GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Quadro NVS 135M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG86MGT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)15 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240
Core clock speed400 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt204 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20051.84
Floating-point performance0.0256 gflops0.7085 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2484 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.504 GB/s159.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 15 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 204 Watt

NVS 135M has 1940% lower power consumption.

GTX 285 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 135M and GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Quadro NVS 135M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 18 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 135M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.