Radeon R2 Graphics vs Quadro NVS 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG86Beema
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)27 February 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8128
Core clock speed400 MHz351 MHz
Number of transistors210 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6002.808
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS0.08986 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 27 February 2015
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

NVS 130M has 50% lower power consumption.

R2 Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 130M and Radeon R2 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R2 Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Radeon R2 Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 550 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 130M or Radeon R2 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.