FirePro M3900 vs Quadro NVS 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1431not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG86Seymour
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8160
Core clock speed400 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors210 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6006.000
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 20 Watt

NVS 130M has 100% lower power consumption.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 130M and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 130M or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.