Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient vs Quadro NVS 120M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1513not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG72Raven
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7704
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors112 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80055.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.76 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

NVS 120M has 250% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 11 Efficient, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 120M and Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 120M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
Quadro NVS 120M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 120M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 120M or Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.