Tesla M2075 vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG72GF110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7448
Core clock speed300 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20032.14
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s150.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 200 Watt

NVS 110M has 1900% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla M2075 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or Tesla M2075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.