Arc Pro A40 vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1504not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG72DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)8 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71024
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors112 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200108.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 110M has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and Arc Pro A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro A40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
Intel Arc Pro A40
Arc Pro A40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Arc Pro A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or Arc Pro A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.