Radeon 535 Mobile vs Quadro M600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking600not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM107Polaris 24
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed837 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0224.58
Floating-point processing power0.6728 gflops0.7864 gflops
ROPs88
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s36 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2015 18 April 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M600M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

535 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M600M and Radeon 535 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 535 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Quadro M600M
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Radeon 535 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate Quadro M600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 159 votes

Rate Radeon 535 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.