ATI VGA Wonder vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking179not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Power efficiency8.94no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Wonder (1990−1992)
GPU code nameGM20018800-1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)5 February 1990 (34 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed988 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.9no data
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs192no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount12 GB256 KB
Memory bus width384 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s40 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2015 5 February 1990
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 256 KB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

Quadro M6000 has an age advantage of 25 years, a 4915100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 and VGA Wonder. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while VGA Wonder is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
ATI VGA Wonder
VGA Wonder

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 147 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 13 votes

Rate VGA Wonder on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.