Quadro FX 700 vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking228not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Power efficiency8.63no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGM200NV35
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2015 (10 years ago)17 March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed988 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.92.200
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs1928
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s8.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2015 17 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

Quadro M6000 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 and Quadro FX 700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 700
Quadro FX 700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 154 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or Quadro FX 700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.