ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking228not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Power efficiency8.64no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM200RV635
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2015 (11 years ago)28 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072120
Core clock speed988 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate213.95.776
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS0.1733 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs1928
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm232 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz594 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s19.01 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2015 28 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 55 Watt

Quadro M6000 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650, on the other hand, has 355% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 and All-In-Wonder HD 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder HD 3650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 156 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or All-In-Wonder HD 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.