Tesla M2050 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.16no data
Power efficiency8.53no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM200GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2016 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 $2,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072448
Core clock speed988 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate285.232.20
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs25656
L1 Cache1.1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache3 MB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm248 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB3 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s148.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.22.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2016 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

M6000 24 GB has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 24 GB and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 24 GB or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.