P3000 Mobile vs M5500

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro M5500
20.42
+6.4%

M5500 outperforms P3000 Mobile by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking250269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.699.96
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM204N17E-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date4 April 2016 (7 years old)11 January 2017 (7 years old)
Current price$1700 $537
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 270% better value for money than Quadro M5500.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1139 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed1140 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors5200 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate149.197.20
Floating-point performanceno data3,110 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M5500 and Quadro P3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6606 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.21.4
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Pro+no data
3D Stereono data+
Mosaic++
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+1.6%
64
−1.6%
4K27−30
−3.7%
28
+3.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5.8%
50−55
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+6.1%
65−70
−6.1%
Hitman 3 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5.8%
50−55
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+6.1%
65−70
−6.1%
Hitman 3 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−40%
63
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5.9%
50−55
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5.8%
50−55
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+6.1%
65−70
−6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+36.4%
33
−36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Hitman 3 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+5.1%
35−40
−5.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−4.8%
22
+4.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

This is how Quadro M5500 and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro M5500 is 1.6% faster than P3000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • P3000 Mobile is 3.7% faster than Quadro M5500

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M5500 is 36.4% faster than the P3000 Mobile.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 40% faster than the Quadro M5500.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is ahead in 65 tests (96%)
  • P3000 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.42 19.20
Recency 4 April 2016 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro M5500 and Quadro P3000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 34 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 123 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.