GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro M520

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro M520
4.82

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking601581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.53
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM108N14-GE
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years old)30 May 2013 (10 years old)
Current priceno data$93
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed756 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHz863 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate16.6655.23
Floating-point performanceno data1,326 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M520 and GeForce GTX 765M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Supportno data+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Playno data+
3D Stereo+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 API
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.0+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M520 4.82
GTX 765M 5.15
+6.8%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M520 1870
GTX 765M 1998
+6.8%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M520 11278
GTX 765M 14870
+31.8%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 32% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M520 2658
GTX 765M 4019
+51.2%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 51% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M520 2342
GTX 765M 2479
+5.8%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 6% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M520 13394
GTX 765M 17616
+31.5%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 32% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M520 6202
GTX 765M 7043
+13.6%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 14% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M520 7173
+30.1%
GTX 765M 5514

Quadro M520 outperforms GeForce GTX 765M by 30% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M520 28
GTX 765M 36
+28.3%

GeForce GTX 765M outperforms Quadro M520 by 28% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45−50
−13.3%
51
+13.3%
Full HD21
−90.5%
40
+90.5%
4K12
+0%
12−14
+0%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how Quadro M520 and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 765M is 13.3% faster than Quadro M520

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 765M is 90.5% faster than Quadro M520

4K resolution:

  • GTX 765M is 0% faster than Quadro M520

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 765M is 50% faster than the Quadro M520.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is ahead in 45 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (26%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.82 5.15
Recency 13 January 2017 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro M520 and GeForce GTX 765M. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Quadro M520 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 765M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M520
Quadro M520
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 64 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.