GeForce 805A vs Quadro M520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.05no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGM108GK208
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed1041 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.6612.13
Floating-point processing power0.7995 TFLOPS0.2911 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.03.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M520 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 805A, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M520 and GeForce 805A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M520 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 805A is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M520
Quadro M520
NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Quadro M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M520 or GeForce 805A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.