NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 675MX

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Kepler
Code name
GM204
 
GK104
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
1 October 2012

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
960
CUDA cores
n/d
 
960
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
100 Watt
Texture fill rate
78.00
 
48.0 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
1,256 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
large
Bus support
n/d
 
PCI Express 2.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None
SLI options
-
 
2-way

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
115.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
HDMI
-
 
+
HDCP
-
 
+
Maximum VGA resolution
n/d
 
Up to 2048x1536
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision
-
 
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
-
 
+
SLI
n/d
 
+
DirectX 11
n/d
 
DirectX 11
FXAA
n/d
 
+
TXAA
n/d
 
+
Adaptive VSync
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
12 API
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5
OpenCL
n/d
 
1.1
Vulkan
+
 
-

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
24.91 +107.8%
 
11.99 −107.8%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204 +142.1%
 
20325 −142.1%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937 +154.9%
 
2721 −154.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723 +172.8%
 
2831 −172.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259 +157.8%
 
3979 −157.8%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
18950
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
41
Passmark
4567 +91.1%
 
2390 −91.1%
Octane Render OctaneBench
53 +60.6%
 
33 −60.6%

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +298.4%
 
63 Mh/s −298.4%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.43 +2050%
 
0.02 −2050%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20
 
n/d
Battlefield 4 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
109
medium / 768p
n/d
 
80
high / 768p
n/d
 
53
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
24
Crysis 3 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
85
medium / 768p
n/d
 
59
high / 768p
n/d
 
41
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
16
Dota 2 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
107
medium / 768p
n/d
 
89
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
51
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
260
medium / 768p
n/d
 
114
high / 768p
n/d
 
101
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
44
Tomb Raider (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
213
medium / 768p
n/d
 
117
high / 768p
n/d
 
77
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
23
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
83
medium / 768p
n/d
 
39
high / 768p
n/d
 
21
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
14
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
medium / 768p
n/d
 
221
high / 768p
n/d
 
193
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
131
Diablo III (2012)
medium / 768p
n/d
 
195
high / 768p
n/d
 
176
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
110
Dishonored (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
122
medium / 768p
n/d
 
123
high / 768p
n/d
 
122
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
103
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
medium / 768p
n/d
 
95
high / 768p
n/d
 
74
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
44

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

107.8% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
2050% faster (about 21.5 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 1 October 2012)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 115.2 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

More pipelines (960 vs 1)
3D Vision
3DTV Play
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
DirectX 11
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
Adaptive VSync
TXAA
FXAA
HDMI
HDCP
3D Vision / 3DTV Play

So, Quadro M4000M or GTX 675MX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675MX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 675MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or GeForce GTX 675MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.