To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Price now
429$
Games supported
81%
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 773 MHz
- Max video memory 8GB GDDR5
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 6008 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1000 MHz
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 6780 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
500$
Games supported
80%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 237 | 246 |
| Value for money | 10.87 | 15.62 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 June 2015 (7 years old) | 5 June 2017 (5 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | no data |
| Current price | $429 (0.5x MSRP) | $500 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1664 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1105 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 80.39 | 123.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 192 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | No outputs |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
| nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Quadro M4000 outperforms Radeon Pro 570 by 4% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Radeon Pro 570 outperforms Quadro M4000 by 67% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Radeon Pro 570 outperforms Quadro M4000 by 66% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000 and Radeon Pro 570. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 299 Mh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 16.83 | 16.15 |
| Recency | 29 June 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1664 | 1792 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro M4000 by AMD
According to our data, the nearest equivalent to Quadro M4000 by AMD is Radeon Pro 570, which is slower by 4% and lower by 9 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M4000:
Competitors of Radeon Pro 570 by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon Pro 570's NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro T1000, which is faster by 3% and higher by 7 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro 570:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
