Quadro P3000 Mobile vs M4000

Place in performance ranking	291	270
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	10.42	9.88
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GM204	N17E-Q1
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	29 June 2015 (8 years old)	11 January 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$791	no data
Current price	$314 (0.4x MSRP)	$537

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M4000 has 5% better value for money than P3000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1664	1280
Core clock speed	773 MHz	1088 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1215 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.39	97.20
Floating-point performance	2,573 gflops	3,110 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000 and Quadro P3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 192 GB/s	168 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync	no data
Display Port	no data	1.4

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	+	+
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Display Management	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −16.4%	64 +16.4%
4K	24−27 −16.7%	28 +16.7%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	17.27	19.19
Recency	29 June 2015	11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	75 Watt