ATI Radeon X1650 vs Quadro M3000 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGM204RV516
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2016 (9 years ago)20 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed540 MHz635 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.562.540
Floating-point processing power1.106 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s6.272 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2016 20 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

M3000 SE has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000 SE and Radeon X1650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 74 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000 SE or Radeon X1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.