Radeon Pro V520 vs Quadro M3000 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.02
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 October 2016 (9 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
Core clock speed540 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate34.56230.4
Floating-point processing power1.106 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64144
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthMXM ModuleIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2016 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 225 Watt

M3000 SE has 200% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000 SE and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
Quadro M3000 SE
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000 SE or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.